While no one is really sure who originally owed the villa, it is thought it may have belonged to the tetrarch Marcus Aurelius Maximianius. The mosaics are believed to have been brought from Africa and the craftsmanship that of North African slaves. The art is absolutely beautiful and one can only imagine how much work went into each of these pictures. The mosaics were probably made in the 4th century AD, a time when the North African provinces were important area in the economic and artistic world. The many colored mosaics were specialties of the North African artists. The mosaics at the villa are most definitely of African origin and similar ones have been found in Carthage and other areas in North Africa. Many of the motives of the mosaics are also African in nature, especially the hunting scenes. A large part of the tesserae--the small colored stones--used in the mosaics are in colors not found locally.
Even though some of the tallest parts of the villa have always been above ground, the existence of the villa were almost entirely forgotten and the area was used for cultivation. Early in the 19th century pieces of mosaics and some columns were found. Some excavations were carried out later in that century, but the first serious excavations were carried out by Paolo Orsi in 1929, and then from 1935-1939 by Giuseppe Cultrera. The most recent major excavations were done from 1950-1960 by Gino Vinicio Gentili, after which a cover was built over the entire villa to protect it. A few minor excavations were done in the 1970s by Andrea Carandini.
In the late ages most of Sicily was partitioned into huge agricultural estates called "latifundia" (singular "latifundium"). The size of the villa and the amount and quality of its artwork indicate it was probably the center of one of these latifundium, and the owner was probably a member of the sentorial class, maybe even the imperial family--the absolute upper class of the Roman Empire.
It is believed the villa served several purposes. Some of the rooms in the villa were obviously residential, others were used for official purposes and the purpose of many of the rooms has yet to be determined. It is also obvious the unknown rooms were not built for commercial or production reasons. It probably had been the permanent or semi-permanent residence of the owner. It would have been where the owner, in his role as patron, received his local clients, and would have also functioned as the administrative center of the latifundium. As of today only the manorial portions of the villa have been excavated. The ancillary structures--those for housing the slaves, the workshops, stables and so forth, have not yet been located.
The villa was a single story building, centered on the peristyle (the central open span in a Roman house). All of the main public and private rooms were arranged around this peristyle. Entrance to the peristyle is via the atrium from the west, with thermal baths in the northwest. On the north were service rooms and guest rooms, and on the east were private apartments and a huge basilica (central hall in the villa). On the south are rooms of unknown purpose. To the south, somewhat detached and almost as an afterthought, is a separate area containing the elliptical peristyle (a secondary peristyle for invited guests), service rooms and a large triclinium (dining room which contains Herculean mosaics).
The overall plan of the villa was dictated by several factors--older constructions on the site, the slight slope on which it was built, and the passage of the sun and the evening winds. The higher ground to the east is occupied by the Great Basilica, the private apartments and the Corridor o the Great Hunt, where can be found outstanding mosaics with magnificent scenes of hunts for live animals. In the middle ground by the peristyle are the guest rooms, the Elliptical Peristyle and the triclinium, while the lower ground to the west contains the thermal baths. These baths are heated by hot air chambers beneath them, and the floor of the baths are held above these chambers by a pile of bricks. There is a picture of the baths in the slide show below.
In the time the villa was in use, the common visitor, usually male, would arrive at the entrance, viewing the three way arch of triumph with fountains between the arches and frescoes on the walls. These would be testimony to the military might of the proprietor of the villa. The visitor would then enter the atrium with yet another fountain and a shady colonnade on tow sides. To the left was the passage to the latrine in case the visitor needed to use the facilities. To the right was the tablinum (room for welcoming guests), which was also the entrance to the peristyle, or central open space in the villa. Less important visitors would be allowed no further than the atrium.
The visitor would be greeted symbolically in the tablinum by mosaics of the hosts offering olive branches before entering the peristyle. He would then wait in the shade of the colonnade until he could be received in the great basilica. There was a more luxurious internal latrine here in case once again it was needed. Many visitors would be allowed no further than this. The most important visitors would be allowed to climb the few steps to the Corridor of the Great Hunt, and once again he would have to wait. He would view amazing mosaics of odd animals that could be found on various estates of the patron. If the visitor was one of the utmost importance he may be invited into the Great Basilica to finally meet the master of the house. The rest of the villa was probably off limits to all but a select few who were mostly peers of the owner. They may be invited to use the thermal baths, which was an occasion for socialising for the Romans. They may also be invited to have dinner and conversation with the master in the elliptical peristyle and the triclinium.
Most of the rooms in the villa had an actual purpose that was obvious. The purpose of the rooms could be determined from their position in the villa and from the way the room was decorated. The purpose of the thermal baths, various latrines and the areas intended for the public--the entrance, atrium, tablinum, peristyle and great basilica--were easily recognized. The elliptical peristyle and the triclinium were private or semi-private and were intended for relaxing and dining.
Some of the guest rooms were probably used for service rooms and others were intended for guests or for the proprietor and his family. Some of these rooms have simple geometric or poorly laid mosaics indicating a less important purpose. Other rooms have elaborate mosaics, indicating a more important purpose. These include the Room of the Dance, the Room of the Fishing Cupids, and the Room of the Little Hunt.
The private apartments are open to several interpretations. The larger southern apartment has a central hall--The Hall of Arion--that is flanked by smaller rooms with mosaics of children playing or working, and was thought to be the cubicle of mothers and children, while the northern apartment has a cubicle with erotic scenes and was taken to be the quarters of the pater familias. This theory has been contradicted by the fact that the highest ranking member of the family would probably not have the smaller and less elaborately decorated rooms, while the children would have the more comfortable sleeping quarters. It makes much more sense to think of the areas as separate apartments for two couples of unequal social status. There are some parallels in the rooms that also indicate this is probably true. Each apartment have two cubicles, one with a square apse and one with a round apse, possibly intended for the male and female respectively, with a common entrance. In the larger apartment the Hall of Arion may have been a library.
The Hall of Orpheus is yet another room with an unclear purpose. It has been compared to the central hall in the larger apartment, but could also be compared to the Great Basilica because it too has an apse. If the villa had been inhabited by two families of unequal standing, each would have had his own areas for the reception of guests and clients.
As stated earlier, there is really no definite information as to who owned the villa. A very early travel guide names the third mansio, or station for resting and changing horses on the Catania-Agregento road as Philosophiana, which was located about 45 Roman mikes from Agrigento. This is in the area of the villa. About 10 miles to the south of the villa is the location of Sofiana, where Roman remains are associated with the latifundium Philosophiana. Sofiana is the most likely candidate for the mansio on the main Roman road. The stations were usually named for the latifundium on whose territory they were located, so the latifundium of the villa was probably named Philosophiana.
There are several theories as to who was the first owner of the villa. Some believed it belonged to the Roman Emperor Maximianus Herculius, due to the images of ivy leaves in many of the mosaics, a decorative element often associated with him. Others feel the villa may have belonged to Maxentius, the son of the Emperor Maximianus Herculius, or to Claudius Mamertinus, who was prefect of Illyricum, Italy and Africa under Julian the Apostate.
There are also elements in the villa of both the military and civilian worlds. The entrance has all the characteristics of a triumphal arch and remains of military insignia can be found on the walls beside the entrance arches. On the other side, the villa is obviously civilian and there are references to literature and poetry in the mosaics, leading people to believe the owner was an accomplished intellectual. At the time the villa was built military and civilian careers had been separated for decades. No one could have both military and civilian ties, with one exception--C. Ceionius Rufius Volusiano, who had been Prefect of the City of Rome--a civilian responsibility--and consul under both Maxentius and Constantine I, but he had also been prefect of the praetorian guard under Maxentius--a military post. He had suppressed a rebellion in Africa where he also ahd huge estates. His son, Ceionius Rufius Albinus, was consul in 335 and Prefect of the CIty. Albinus was also a renowned writes of logic, geometry, history and poetry. By tradition the honorary crown of a poet was made of ivy, which would explain the use of ivy in many of the mosaics, and in the only surviving official inscription to him he is given the title philosophus, just as the latifundium. This could also explain the two private apartments in the villa and the two separate halls for receiving clients, one being smaller than the other.
All of these theories are only supported by circumstantial evidence. In actuality it is not known who owned the villa, and it will probably never be known unless there is some evidence found in future excavations. What we do know is the owner was wealthy and powerful, probably a member of the senatorial class or imperial family, he had property in Africa, he made money from the capture of wild animals for the venationes (animal hunts) in the Colosseum and elsewhere, he was fond of hunting, he was a lover and patron of music and poetry, he used ivy leaves as a personal or family symbol, he was almost certainly pagan, and finally, he supported the factio prasina (green team) in the races in the Circus Maximus.
No comments:
Post a Comment